![]() I have removed the HTML comments, in the change, to show just the simple wikitext. Perhaps that phrase could have been re-worded more clearly, with examples, but that is why the change is being made, to conform to WP:ACCESS. ![]() This is sometimes an issue in articles with multiple images on both sides of the screen although lower resolutions will tend to stretch paragraphs vertically, moving images apart in that direction, be careful not to add images or other floating content on both sides of the screen simultaneously." The problem actually does occur on thousands of other pages, as well, so that's why WP:ACCESS says to be careful "not to add images or other floating content on both sides of the screen simultaneously". "The lowest resolution that it is considered possible to support without adversely affecting other users is 800圆00 all articles should look acceptable at this resolution without excessive horizontal scrolling. In WP:Accessibility, the issue is to beware how narrow windows "stretch paragraphs vertically".If your change is warranted here, why not on a thousand other pages? Johnuniq ( talk) 04:18, 7 June 2010 (UTC) Reply Is there a discussion somewhere that such hacks are desirable? Accessibility is great, but simple wikitext should be strongly supported. contribs) 21:07, 6 June 2010 (UTC) Reply Would you please spell out the section of WP:Accessibility that you believe justifies adding such complexity to the wikitext of this guideline.Wikid77 ( talk) 20:58, 6 June 2010 (UTC) Reply Why just that page? And I'm still a bit confused.I just looked at it in a very small window, and it seemed fine? - AnmaFinotera ( talk Users with wide laptop screens will see no change. Setting the width for the Table of Contents will prevent squeezing it (as a 2-words-per-line TOC box) on 800圆00px display (so the page would looked balanced on narrow windows). ![]() contribs) 05:31, 6 June 2010 (UTC) Reply It's just the display of that guideline page, not a rule to be added to the guideline for all TOCs.Wikid77 ( talk) 05:21, 6 June 2010 (UTC) Reply I'm a bit confused.are you talking about all TOCs or just the one at WP:User pages? And why is it necessary? - AnmaFinotera ( talk The screen could actually be narrowed even more, but users with wide laptop screens should be unaffected, and would not see any difference about the Table of Contents on their laptop screens. Such special typesetting of tables, for narrow screens (800圆00 pixels), is part of guideline WP:Accessibility. The following wikitable will keep the TOC as 340 pixels wide, avoiding the namespaces-box, so that the TOC will not compress as 2-words-per-line on narrow windows: I am planning to change the display of guideline WP:User_pages, at the Table of Contents (TOC), to ensure that the TOC-box does not compress on narrowed (or half-screen) windows. JohnCD ( talk) 10:02, 28 April 2010 (UTC) Reply MoS naming style Block notices while a block is in effect are not covered, but I see no reason to prohibit removing them as anyone editing the talk page or looking at the user's contributions sees a block notice anyway. I have amended the line to read:ĭeclined unblock requests, ban and confirmed sockpuppetry related notices (while any sanctions are still in effect) and will check with him. Before that, it read "declined unblock requests". What does "declined block" mean? If it means "declined unblock requests", it should say so and should separately make clear the position on block notices which are still in force - may the user remove them? JohnCD ( talk) 19:39, 25 April 2010 (UTC) Reply Looking at the history, I see that the change was introduced, I guess inadvertently, during a major rewrite by FT2 ( talk The following sentence in the list of things that may not be removed by the user seems to me unclear:ĭeclined block, ban and confirmed sockpuppetry related notices (while any sanctions are still in effect) 15.3 Probably-way-too-simplistic proposal.14 RfC: Sexually provocative content in userspace.13 What happened to "How do I create a user subpage?".12 Fake Wikipedia articles on userpages.11 CFD for Category:Temporary Wikipedian userpages.8.3.3 Should they be tolerated for a new user, if under one week old, but not over one month?.8.3.2 Should secret pages be tolerated based on some assessment of the editor, on his productive edit history and percentage productive edits.8.3.1 Should secret pages that exist despite discouragement be tolerated?.7 WP:REMOVED - should current blocks be in the list?.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |